Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0207382, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30481191

RESUMO

Administrating antibiotics to young piglets may have short- and long-term consequences on the gut microbiota. We hypothesised that these consequences may be alleviated by concurrent probiotic administration. The study objective was to investigate the effect of administrating gentamicin and a mixture of Bacillus (B.) licheniformis, B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaeceans spores on the gut microbiota of piglets pre- and post-weaning. Twenty-four sows and their litters were randomly allocated to four treatment groups receiving; a) Bacillus spore mixture (six B. subtilis, two B. amyloliquefaeceans, and one B. licheniformis) fed to sows and piglets (PRO); b) gentamicin (5 mg per day) administered to piglets on day 4, 5, and 6 of age (AB); c) Bacillus spore mixture fed to sows and piglets, and gentamicin to piglets (PRO+AB); or d) no administration of probiotics or antibiotics (CTRL). Faecal and digesta samples were collected repeatedly during the study. Selected samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing, culture counts, and organic acid, biogenic amine and tissue gene expression analysis. Treatment had a significant effect on the faecal microbial community composition on day 28 and 42, and colonic community on day 28. Faecal species richness (observed and estimated) and Shannon index, and colonic species richness, were higher in AB compared to PRO piglets on day 28, and were not significantly different from day 42. PRO piglets had the highest faecal concentration of iso-butyric acid on day 7 and a higher butyric acid concentration compared to CTRL piglets. We conclude that gentamicin and Bacillus spores influence the gut microbial diversity of piglets, although administration of gentamicin did not result in dysbiosis as hypothesised.


Assuntos
Bacillus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Gentamicinas/farmacologia , Probióticos/farmacologia , Esporos Bacterianos/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Animais , Fezes/microbiologia , Distribuição Aleatória , Suínos
2.
Br J Nutr ; 113(6): 923-34, 2015 Mar 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25743486

RESUMO

The present study investigated the effect of feeding bovine colostrum (BC) to piglets in comparison with feeding a milk replacer (MR) and conventional rearing by the sow on the intestinal immune system and number of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) colonising the intestinal tissue. Piglets (23-d-old) were allocated to one of the following four groups: (1) killed at the beginning of the experiment (Base); (2) separated from the sow and fed BC (BC-fed); (3) separated from the sow and fed a MR (MR-fed); (4) kept with the sow (Sow-Milk). Blood was sampled on days 1 and 8, and faecal samples were collected on days 1, 3, 5 and 8. On day 8, piglets were killed and gastrointestinal digesta and intestinal segments were collected. The frequency of diarrhoea was found to be higher (P≤ 0·019) in MR-fed piglets than in BC-fed and Sow-Milk piglets. Piglets from the MR-fed group had the lowest lactic acid bacteria:haemolytic E. coli ratio (P(treat)= 0·064) in the faeces. The number of E. coli colonising the intestinal tissue was higher (P< 0·001) in piglets from the MR-fed group than in those from the BC-fed and Sow-Milk groups. Piglets from the Sow-Milk group had a higher (P= 0·020) mucosal IgG concentration than those from the MR-fed group, but did not exhibit any difference when compared with piglets from the Base and BC-fed groups. Piglets from the BC-fed group exhibited a reduced (P≤ 0·037) expression level of Toll-like receptor-4 in the intestinal mucosa when compared with those from the MR-fed and Sow-Milk groups. The expression level of IL-2 was higher (P≤ 0·051) in piglets from the MR-fed group than in those from the other treatment groups. In conclusion, feeding BC rather than MR to the piglets reduced the colonisation of intestine by ETEC and modulated the intestinal immune system, whereas no differences were observed in piglets fed BC and conventionally reared by the sows.


Assuntos
Ração Animal , Colostro , Escherichia coli Enterotoxigênica/imunologia , Métodos de Alimentação/veterinária , Imunidade nas Mucosas , Mucosa Intestinal/imunologia , Sus scrofa/imunologia , Ração Animal/análise , Animais , Bile/química , Bile/imunologia , Bovinos , Colostro/química , Dinamarca , Escherichia coli Enterotoxigênica/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Escherichia coli Enterotoxigênica/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/microbiologia , Conteúdo Gastrointestinal/química , Conteúdo Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento , Isotipos de Imunoglobulinas/análise , Isotipos de Imunoglobulinas/metabolismo , Interleucina-2/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/microbiologia , Intestino Delgado/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Intestino Delgado/imunologia , Intestino Delgado/metabolismo , Intestino Delgado/microbiologia , Lactobacillaceae/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Lactobacillaceae/imunologia , Lactobacillaceae/isolamento & purificação , Sus scrofa/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Sus scrofa/metabolismo , Sus scrofa/microbiologia , Técnicas de Cultura de Tecidos/veterinária , Receptor 4 Toll-Like/genética , Receptor 4 Toll-Like/metabolismo , Aumento de Peso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...